I've bought a new mobile phone this week, and I thought it would be interesting to compare it to my first mobile, which I bought in November 1994 (and which still works!) My old Nokia was considered slim, compact and lightweight at the time, but it really feels like a housebrick compared to the new phone.
On the right, my 1994 Nokia 2140. Its nickel-hydride battery provided 18 hours standby or 80 mins talktime. It had text messaging, but you could only type in upper case. It had a single band transceiver (GSM1800 only). The LCD screen was monochrome, and text-only. You could hook it up to a computer, but only to use it as a modem with a serial cable, which wasn't supplied. You had to pull out the antenna to make or receive a call. It cost £250, subsidised by an expensive contract.
On the left, my 2007 Sony Ericsson W200i. Its lithium-ion battery affords 360 hours (15 days) standby or 420 mins talktime. It has a graphical LCD colour screen with animated menus, a clock display and a screensaver. It has a tri-band transceiver, supporting GSM1800, GSM900 and GSM1900. In addition to text messaging, it has a built-in email client. It also has a web browser, a calendar and a personal organiser. It can be connected to a PC using a USB cable (supplied) or an infra-red connection. It has 27MB of internal memory and a memory card slot.
It is also an FM radio, an MP3 player, and a digital camera. Cost: £49.
Note that although I have a new phone, I'm using my old 07813 SIM in it, so previous advice about my phone number still applies!
Single Entry
Recent Comments
Stuff
I miss the old antenna. It says I’m a big player in the big city, so don’t get in my way. Mind you, when I got my first mobile I managed to walk into a lamp post. Discretely.
ALP2 - September 13 2007, 16:05
I’m all for things getting smaller, but what happens when things get so small that we lose them all the time. Either we go broke buying new ones or insurances companies halt all business activities.
Barry - September 17 2007, 16:20